Distinctive Aspects of Settlement Agreements and Mediation Agreements

Abstract

In the current process of legal reforms, there is a growing focus on alternative methods for resolving civil and economic-legal disputes. Specifically, in the Republic of Uzbekistan, the practice of peacefully settling disputes through mediation and settlement agreements, both before and during court proceedings, is gradually taking shape. Both approaches aim to resolve disputes and disagreements between parties constructively and on a legal basis. While they share some common aspects, they also have significant differences in terms of their legal nature, form, legal force, and application procedures. This article thoroughly examines the regulatory and legal foundations of settlement agreements and mediation institutions, their differences and similarities, practical applications, and legal outcomes. It also explores the opinions and reflections of national and international legal scholars on this topic. The effective application of these institutions is also analyzed through the examples of advanced practices from foreign countries such as the USA, Germany, Russia, and Kazakhstan. The article explores the impact of settlement agreements and mediation agreements on civil and economic court proceedings, highlighting their role in simplifying litigation processes and swiftly restoring the rights and interests of citizens and entrepreneurs. Additionally, the article presents proposals for improving legislation in this area.